
Revisit the best of the blogs from 17th and friends!
Feminism and Following
Let me start out this post by making something clear. What you are about to read is purely my opinion. One female follower of HM 17th Regt. of Foot. Not necessarily endorsed by the whole.I proudly call myself a feminist. I was raised in a family of strong women and firmly believe there’s nothing any male member of the Regt. can do that I can’t (within reason). But, on the weekends, I lace myself into a corset, put on uncomfortable shoes and clothes, and portray a woman following the army. I submit to orders, dip candles, sew by hand, cry on cue, and get pretty desperate when I get caught looting. It’s “funcomfortable”. Why would I do this? Aren’t feminism and submission incompatible? Wouldn’t it be more fun and feminist to prove I can reenact a battle just as well as men?First of all, let me just say that I understand the urge to “play with the boys” if you will. I have it too sometimes. Shooting a gun can be WAY more fun than, say, laundry. Plus, let’s face it. People buy tickets for battle reenactments. Women’s roles interpretation are generally a nice side benefit, unless it’s Princeton. So if you want to join the guys in your regt. in battle, that’s your choice.So why don’t I? First of all, accuracy. As you can see throughout our website, accuracy and research are bedrocks for the 17th. Now, did some women dress like men and join the army? Yes. Deborah Sampson is proof of that. Did some women go to extraordinary lengths to help the army? Considering Mary Ludwig Hays and Margaret Corbin, each a candidate for inspiring “Molly Pitcher”, it’s clear some did. So a good Deborah Sampson or Mary Hays or Margaret Corbin impression can be just as accurate as mine. But remember. We only know of cases like these in the Continental army. So you can argue that while a well-researched Deborah Sampson impression works for the rebels, she may not be right for HM 17th Regt of Foot. Secondly, these cases are outliers. Did they exist? Yes. Could there be more? Sure. But they’re still very rare. Meanwhile, we can prove that hundreds of women followed both the British and American armies, serving in women’s roles. Check out our follower's page for proof. These women did laundry. They nursed. They sold goods. They cooked (not for the men but for each other). They received rations. They raised kids and followed husbands, sons, and fathers. So a “camp follower” impression IS an equally accurate impression of an army on campaign.The second reason is my personal soapbox. Think about something. When I mention “women during the Revolutionary War”, who do you think of? My bet is Betsy Ross, Abigail Adams, Martha Washington, maybe the Schuyler sisters thanks to Hamilton, or possibly Deborah Sampson or “Molly Pitcher”. Now don’t get me wrong. Every single one of these women are extraordinary, important, and deserve recognition for their contributions. But the majority of them are high-class ladies, unlikely to endure the hardships of a campaign. They might visit camp and stay there, but only when the army is in winter quarters. The ones who did follow the army, as said before, are outliers. Now, did you know about Baroness von Riedesel? She was the gentry wife of a Hessian general who followed him to America and kept a journal of her time with General Burgoyne’s army. That journal includes a detailed account of her experience at the Battle of Saratoga. She was also taken prisoner by the Continental army. How about Mrs. Reed of Trenton? She was the wife of a Continental officer who was forced to house Hessians in her home before the 1st Battle of Trenton. According to her daughter Martha, when a Hessian woman wanted her shoe buckle and Mrs. Reed hesitated, the Hessian took the shoes off Mrs. Reed’s feet and hit her in the face with the heel. In front of her kids! (Read William Dwyer’s “The Day is Ours” for more information). Check out our friend Kirsten's research on Bridget Connor as well, who was drummed out of camp for stealing shirts. Then there’s the hundreds of nameless followers we know nothing about. These women’s stories are real, they’re important, and they deserve to be told. If we don’t tell them, who will?They’re why I do this hobby. They’re why I choose to be “funcomfortable” as I do. To me, personally, I am being a feminist by telling these forgotten stories and portraying what the women actually did. I choose to honor these women by putting their stories out there when they’ve been ignored for centuries. Considering that neither army could function without its follower community, one could argue these women are just as important as the men they followed. Now how’s that for feminism?God save the King!Katherine Becnel
Sewing Parties and Getting Things Done.

Battle of Princeton and the Ravages of Princetown.










Funcomfortable
At our Princeton event this past weekend (recap post still to come), HM 17th Regt of Foot in America, as well as other British and Continental reenactor regiments, braved some particularly harsh weather conditions. Below freezing temperatures all weekend. Falling snow all day Saturday. Trudging through about 5 inches of snow Saturday and Sunday. All while wearing 18th century clothing. These conditions are definitely not something anyone could term "comfortable". As such, our head camp follower, Mary Sherlock, came up with the perfect term for the weekend. It was "funcomfortable".When we thought about this term a little further, we realized that "funcomfortable" perfectly sums up not just our weekend at Princeton, but the 17th Regt as a whole. There are many things we do that most people, including US, cannot call "comfortable". Is it comfortable to wear stays and multiple layers of petticoats in 90 degree heat while you're doing laundry by a fire surrounded by stone buildings? Not particularly. Is it comfortable to trudge through the snow so you can recreate an 18th century battle that your side actually lost? I think most of our members would agree it was definitely NOT comfortable. Is it comfortable to prick your fingers on needles while you hand-sew a garment? Is it comfortable to have to undo a long line of stitches because you’ve made a mistake, then redo it? No, sometimes it’s not. In fact, many of these could be called the very definition of “uncomfortable”.But here’s the thing. Every one of those situations are also things that we find FUN. While it may be extremely uncomfortable to be standing by a fire in 90 degree heat in multiple layers of 18th century clothing, it IS fun to be able to tell a visitor at Fort Ticonderoga how camp followers did laundry for the army. While it may be super uncomfortable to not be able to feel your toes while you recreate a battle, it IS fun to honor the valor the very regiment you are portraying displayed 240 years ago when you drop your knapsack and run at the Continental Army on the field of battle at Princeton. It is a lot of fun to be able to make history come alive for yourself, your friends, and the general public. It is a lot of fun to be able to engage with them, and get them thinking about the past in a whole new way. And while it can hurt quite a bit when a needle pricks your thumb, sewing parties surrounded by your friends, all working on the same things you are, can be an absolute blast.So. That’s what we are. That’s what we embrace. We are “funcomfortable”. We hope you find time to be “funcomfortable” with us in 2017.God Save The King!Katherine Becnel